The following simultaneous equations may be quickly and
easily solved by “double-substitution” method.
The conventional single substitution method is often times too lengthy and very prone to errors. Try your conventional method, before looking at my "double substitution' method and you will know what I mean.
So, always have a quick and closer look at the simultaneous equations before you - if they are amenable to “double-substitution” method, then use it. (Now no longer in Form 2 or Form 3, so use a more "skillful method" where possible. hahaha :))
The conventional single substitution method is often times too lengthy and very prone to errors. Try your conventional method, before looking at my "double substitution' method and you will know what I mean.
So, always have a quick and closer look at the simultaneous equations before you - if they are amenable to “double-substitution” method, then use it. (Now no longer in Form 2 or Form 3, so use a more "skillful method" where possible. hahaha :))
1.
Solve the simultaneous equations
3x + y = 1
x2 + 3xy + y2 = 5
-------------------------------------------------------------
2.
Solve the simultaneous equations
2x2 + 9xy + 9y2 = 0
3x + 3y = 2
-------------------------------------------------------------
The “Double-Substitution”
Method:
Q 1) 3x
+ y = 1 …Eqn
(1)
x2
+ 3xy + y2 = 5 …Eqn (2)
Fr. (1): y = 1 – 3x …Eqn (3)
Fr. (2): x2 + y(3x + y) = 5 …Eqn (4)
Put (1) & (3) into (4):
x2
+ (1 – 3x)(1) = 5
x2
+ 1 – 3x = 5
x2
– 3x – 4 = 0
(x
+ 1)(x – 4) = 0
x = -1 or, x = 4
Use (3): y = 1 – 3(-1) or, y = 1 - 3(4)
y = 4 or, y = -11
Answer: x = -1, y
= 4
x = 4, y = -11
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Q2) 2x2 + 9xy + 9y2 = 0 …Eqn (1)
Q2) 2x2 + 9xy + 9y2 = 0 …Eqn (1)
3x + 3y = 2 …Eqn
(2)
Fr. (2): 3y = 2 – 3x …Eqn (3)
Fr. (1): 2x2
+ 3y(3x + 3y) = 0 …Eqn (4)
Put (2) & (3) into (4):
2x2
+ (2 -3x)(2) = 0
2x2
+ 4 – 6x = 0
2(x2
+ 2 – 3x) = 0
2(x - 1)(x
– 2) = 0
x = 1 or, x = 2
Use (3): 3y = 2 – 3(1) or, 3y = 2 – 3(2)
y = -1/3 or, y = -4/3
Answer: x = 1, y = -1/3
x = 2, y = -4/3
You can also use 'double substitution' to solve part (c) of the question below easily. Try your conventional method first before you click here for my "double-substitution" method.
1)
Using cos(A + B) ≡ cos A cos B – sin A sin B,
(a)
show that
(i)
sin2 Ө = (1/2)(1 – cos 2Ө),
(ii)
cos2 Ө = (1/2)(cos 2Ө + 1) (4)
f(Ө) = 1 + 10 sin2 Ө - 16 sin4 Ө .
(b)
Show that f(Ө) = 3 cos 2Ө – 2 cos 4Ө. (4)
(c)
Solve the equation
1 + 10 sin2 Өo - 16 sin4 Өo +
2 cos 4Өo = 0.25, for 0 ≤ Ө ≤ 180
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment